The state hasn’t had this many constitutional amendments on the ballot in 40 years as Republican lawmakers seek ways to curb the power of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.
by Tom Kertscher / Wisconsin Watch June 24th, 2024 June 21st, 2024
Our mission is to serve Wisconsin with integrity, guided by Trust Project standards. Support our ongoing service to the community by making a donation today .
In less than two years, Republicans have put seven constitutional amendment questions on Wisconsin election ballots — including three that voters will see in the coming months.
That’s more than Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota and Ohio in 2023 and 2024 — combined.
There has not been this much constitutional amendment activity in Wisconsin in more than 40 years since nine amendment questions were put on the November 1982 ballot. There are five total slated for this year, including two that passed in April, two on the August primary ballot and one in November.
Wake Forest University politics professor John Dinan, author of “State Constitutional Politics: Governing by Amendment in the American States,” said constitutional amendments are commonly used in divided-government states such as Wisconsin, where Democratic Gov. Tony Evers clashes with the Republican-controlled Legislature.
Dinan said Republicans can use the amendments to avoid a veto from Evers or an unwanted ruling from the liberal-majority state Supreme Court.
“It may seem unusual to see amendments being advanced for the purpose of bypassing gubernatorial opposition or insulating policies from state court reversal because we don’t see similar amendments advanced at the federal level,” he said. “But state constitutions and state constitutional amendments have their own distinctive purposes and dynamics.”
To amend the Wisconsin constitution, lawmakers must approve identical changes in consecutive two-year legislative sessions; the amendments do not require the governor’s approval.
From there, Wisconsin voters must approve the change by majority vote in a referendum.
Two constitutional amendment questions that would remove the governor from spending decisions on federal funds are on the Aug. 13 ballot. The questions, which received the first approval from the Legislature in 2022 and the second earlier this year, ask:
1) “Delegation of appropriation power. Shall section 35 (1) of article IV of the constitution be created to provide that the legislature may not delegate its sole power to determine how moneys shall be appropriated?”
2) “Allocation of federal moneys. Shall section 35 (2) of article IV of the constitution be created to prohibit the governor from allocating any federal moneys the governor accepts on behalf of the state without the approval of the legislature by joint resolution or as provided by legislative rule?”
Under current law, the governor has authority in certain instances to accept federal funds without participation of the Legislature. Under the amendments, the governor could not allocate federal funds without approval by the Legislature. The Legislature would approve such allocations through joint resolutions or legislative rules that, unlike state statutes, do not require the governor’s approval.
With ballot question, Wisconsin voters will decide limits on noncitizen voting" width="1200" height="900" />
Opponents of the amendments include the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters, the Wisconsin Democratic Party and the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
They say the amendments risk delaying the expenditure of federal funds issued in an emergency because the governor would have to get legislative approval to spend the money.
The ballot questions are “power grabs” and will “confuse the hell out of voters,” said Nicholas Ramos, the Democracy Campaign’s executive director and a former Democratic campaign staffer.
“It’s an arms race now where they’re doing everything to put into cement and concrete very bad public policies that they were afraid the governor would veto,” he said.
Supporters include Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce and the Badger Institute, a conservative think tank.
The Badger Institute says the state expenditure of federal funds needs legislative oversight. “Decisions about how and why billions in federal dollars were spent remain largely a mystery,” the institute said about federal COVID-19 relief money.
Republican sponsors of the amendments, Sen. Howard Marklein of Spring Green and Rep. Robert Wittke of Racine, did not reply to interview requests.
The amendment ballot questions were spurred by Republican backlash to how Evers spent federal funds allocated during the pandemic.
A total of $5.7 billion was allocated, including $4.5 billion that could be spent at the state’s discretion. In particular, Evers has the authority to spend $2.5 billion from the federal American Rescue Plan Act.
In 2021, the Legislature approved a bill, later vetoed by Evers, that would have required the governor to submit a plan for spending the money to the Legislature’s Republican-controlled budget committee for approval.
That process is similar to the state’s general budget process, in which the governor proposes a budget and the Legislature approves it.
In 2022, an audit from the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau criticized Evers’ administration for not providing documentation requested by auditors on what information was used to make spending decisions on the COVID money.
Wisconsin voters have approved 150 of the 202 constitutional amendments in the state’s history, including 11 of 12 since 2000 and all five since 2020:
Another Republican-sponsored constitutional amendment is set for the Nov. 5 general election ballot. It would reaffirm that only U.S. citizens age 18 and older may vote in Wisconsin elections:
Since 2020, 10 states have put more constitutional amendments up for a vote than Wisconsin, according to Ballotpedia. The most were in Louisiana (36), Texas (24) and Alabama (21).
| State | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Total |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Illinois | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Indiana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iowa | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Michigan | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ohio | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom. Subscribe to our newsletters for original stories and our Friday news roundup.
Just by reading this article, you’re building a more informed Wisconsin, and we sincerely hope that this reporting empowers you with the information you need to make informed decisions and engage in community life.
Our work is about making a tangible difference: uncovering truths, highlighting solutions and fostering a well-informed public. We need 100 new members during our fall campaign to meet our goal.
Supporting Wisconsin Watch means investing in a stronger, more informed Wisconsin, where all residents can access the reliable, objective information necessary to navigate their lives and support democracy. Your contribution helps us continue this vital mission and drive positive change across the state.
Republish This Story
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Close window XFor questions regarding republishing rules please contact Jeff Bauer, digital editor and producer, at jbauer @wisconsinwatch.org
by Tom Kertscher / Wisconsin Watch, Wisconsin Watch
June 24, 2024
